Saturday, August 30, 2008
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Labels: Al Qaeda, terrorism, The War Against Terror
Folkestone Triennial, 'Mobile Gull Appreciation Unit' by Mark Dion
Folkestone Triennial, 'Mobile Gull Appreciation Unit' by Mark Dion
Originally uploaded by Loz Flowers
Labels: Flickr, Folkestone
Ancient Bin, Folkestone
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
You should know you're in trouble when you make even the Daily Show team stop pretending to be brain-dead Republicans.
Labels: Barack Obama, Clinton- Bill or Hillary, Daily Show, Democrats, humour
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Labels: BBC, radio, Radio 1, YouTube
Friday, August 22, 2008
Labels: blogs, sex/gender, transgenderism
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Top Spam Message of the Day
Labels: spam
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Shock News- Latest Bigfoot Turns Out to be Fake!
All together now...
It's dead, made of plastic....
Labels: skepticism, stupidity
Labels: music
Monday, August 18, 2008
Labels: podcasts, science fiction
Labels: children, United Kingdom
Folkestone Triennial, 'Folk Stones' by Mark Wallinger
Folkestone Days
Sunday, August 17, 2008
< sigh >
Well, I suppose I should be grateful there's none of those oh-so-funny references to severe old ladies in tweed and half-moon spectacles at least.
Library fines could become a thing of the past if a group of librarians get their way. A fiery debate has been raging for the past week between librarians, with anti-fine campaigners describing the charges as punitive, old-fashioned and creating a negative impression of libraries.
That first bit is a slight exaggeration. On a small email list for librarians, which most of the year just has spam for management courses, a discussion has sprung from something I can't even remember on to the subject of fines. Less fiery, more aromatherapy candle-y, but that doesn't make a story does it?
"Libraries are facing competition from television, magazines, the internet, e-books, yet they have this archaic and mad idea of charging people money for being slightly late," said library consultant Frances Hendrix - a loud voice in the debate which has been taking place on an online forum for librarians. "It's all so negative, unprofessional and unbusinesslike; like any business, libraries need not to alienate their customers."
Well, that seems reasonable, who could disagree with that?
Librarian Loz Pycock
< David Tennant > What? < /David Tennant >
asked how libraries that want to ditch fines would go about retrieving their books from negligent readers. "We never have enough copies of Driving Theory Test manuals or the Life in the UK citizenship books on the shelves. How do we stop borrowers from keeping the books for the months up to their tests and depriving other users? I don't believe the public are all selfish but it only needs a very small percentage of bad apples to cause problems."
I am very amused to find myself quoted in the article as Alison Flood e-mailed me clearly hoping I'd be willing to lead the charge in favour of burning late-returners in a wicker bibliography. This was due to a negative response I sent to Frances. However, I'm also not a huge fan of fines, though I'd rather make libraries free at the point of access to reserve books and keep fines for people who can't organise themselves to return material on time. When I didn't play ball in her attempt to write an article that has as much of a relationship to reality as a David Batty article about transgendered people I naturally assumed I'd be deleted out of the picture.
I don't think charges in libraries are something that will ever be sorted out to everyone's satisfaction. The charges you can expect to find in libraries these days are mainly those that the original Government Acts didn't proscribe, which is why books are free but it's not free to request them (usually) or take out a DVD. Things are quietening down on this discussion forum again but expect it to flair up again wherever you find more than three librarians in a room.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Labels: Conservatives, homophobia, Kent
Monday, August 11, 2008
Labels: asylum seekers, bisexual, gay, Government, homophobia, immigration, lesbians, LGBT, petitions, transgenderism, transphobia
Madeleine McCann is Bigger Than Jesus!
Septicisle presents a warning from the future of what could lay ahead if the media continue down the path of filling column inches with the most meaningless gibberings of drunk holidaymakers. [via Bloggerheads]
Labels: Daily Mail, Madeleine McCann, media
Friday, August 08, 2008
Um..?
Still, who knows, maybe in 2012, with a little encouragement, the United Kingdom might be finally ready to join the ranks of the civilised nations, if there are any other countries worthy of the name by then.
Labels: China, freedom, human rights, Olympics, United Kingdom, United States
Thursday, August 07, 2008
Alan Moore en Los Simpsons
Labels: Alan Moore, comics, humour, The Simpsons, YouTube
Sunday, August 03, 2008
Labels: authors, hate speech, Islamophobia
Christian Voice Watch
'In the Christian understanding, upon which our laws are or should be based, the death penalty was given to mankind for perpetuity under God's covenant with Noah. That covenant was sealed with the sign of the rainbow (Genesis 9:12-13). 'The Bible verse says: "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed" (Genesis 9:6, AV) and it goes on to explain why: "for in the image of God made He man."
As ever, the strain of making a logical argument proves too much for Green:
'In fact we set the value of a human life even lower. In the sixties, with the abolition of the death penalty in 1965 and the Abortion Act 1967, our politicians took away the death penalty from the guilty, by the state, where it belongs, and imposed it upon the innocent, within the family, where it does not. The result is a society with no compassion for the victims of crime and their families or for the weaker members of society. We see this today in the callous nature of crimes committed by teenagers on each other and in the increasing brutality of Britain.
Yes, we need to get rid of women's access to safe abortion services and bring back the death penalty to make the United Kingdom a less brutal place.
'The death penalty should not be available to judges for all convicted murderers, just for those convicted by overwhelming evidence: that is on the testimony of two or three eye-witnesses, or the equivalent in forensics.
Why do judges need 'two or three eyewitnesses' before Green lets them do what his God is so keen for them to do? And what about soldiers or police marksmen?
It's worth reading to see how Green doesn't really understand the legal system, which possibly explains why he's in the mess he's in at the moment.
'The Governments' proposed 'seriously wronged' defence will not command public confidence, as most people would agree that the commission of adultery is a serious wrong; yet that is to be specifically excluded.
As I understand it, should someone kill their partner due to discovering they were being adulterous, they will not be able to use the 'seriously wronged' defense to get a lesser charge. So this would be a good thing.
However, it would be right to abolish the defence of diminished responsibility - no-one has the right to diminish another's responsibility.
A plea of 'diminished responsibility' is usually used by someone pleading guilty in the hopes of receiving a less severe sentence. I've never heard of someone diminishing another's responsibility and would love to hear Green's explanation for this.
It all just shows how wrong we can get it when man presumes to make laws which should be made by Almighty God.'
Hmmm, sounds like this Jehova chappy should be arrested and prosecuted for Incitement if you ask me.
Labels: Christian Voice, Fundamentalists- Christian, law, Stephen Green